University of Rochester
Hajim School of Engineering & Applied Sciences
School of Medicine and Dentistry
Biomedical Engineering
Search for:
Search
Skip to content
Home
About Us
History
Visiting the CMTI
People
Directors
Instructors
Staff
Students – 2020
Student Teams
CMTI Alumni
Prospective Students
MS Program in Biomedical Engineering
Clinical Practicum
Program Requirements
BME 535 Medical Device Design
BME 459 Applied Human Anatomy
Applicant Information
Information Request
Apply today!
Why Rochester?
Testimonials
Distance to the hospital
Graduate Education at Rochester
Current Students
Program Requirements
Course Scheduler
Program BOX account (sign-in required)
Library Resources
Clinical Practicum
BME 535 Medical Device Design
BME 459 Applied Human Anatomy
Career Resources
General Information
Career Conversations
Alumni Paths
Job Titles in Medical Innovation
Company Search Strategies
MedTech – Career Resources
Education Pathways
Community Resources
Ain Center for Entrepreneurship
Clinical & Translational Science Institute at UofR
Rochester Regional Photonics Cluster
Start-Up NY
High Tech Rochester
HTR Customer Discovery Process
MedTech Association
SBIR and STTR funding for startups
Companies
General Information
Training
Hire our Students
Sponsor a Project
Technology Transfer
Visiting the CMTI
Contact Us
News
Career Conversations
Corporate visits
Special presentations
Class materials
Weekly Team meeting reviews
2020 Weekly Team Meeting Scoring - final
CMTI Reviewer
Gdowski
Lerner
Gira
Other
Email
Individual scores
Student:
Kim
Anna
Jen
Catherine
Molly
Nancy
Erin
Jacques
Student:
John
Kale
Sam
Mia
Eric
Shannon
Luke
Datta
Weekly Contributions (3 highest)
3
2
1
0
Weekly Contributions (3 highest)
3
2
1
0
On time (yes, no): Was the student there on time ready to go for the meeting?
yes
no
On time (yes, no): Was the student there on time ready to go for the meeting?
yes
no
Confidential notes 1
Confidential notes 2
Team scores
Progress - Comments
Progress score (0-3) Was sufficient progress demonstrated in the report and the Design History File
3
2
1
0
Readiness - Comments
Meeting readiness score (0-3) Did they bring new materials and project updates to the meeting. Did they create a reasonable agenda?
3
2
1
0
Notes - Comments
Note taking and meeting documentation (0-3): Was there a clear path for the upcoming week decided? Did they identify tasks and whom is responsible for completing tasks.
3
2
1
0
Additional Comments
Confidential team notes
Total team meeting Score (9 maximum)
Out of 9
Comments are closed.